Hillary Forces Magazine To Kill Story
Times Online has the details…
American Stalinism could be back on it’s way to the White House! The first time around, the Clinton thugs were caught practicing the art of personal destruction of women that Bill had sexually molested as governor of Arkansas. Carville, Begala and crew stopped at nothing to marginalize the women who were victimized by a sex-deranged presidential degenerate. A Hillary presidency, however, will not waste time needlessly like Billy boy did. Her first objective will be the literal destruction of her enemies… there will be hell to pay!
The Clinton machine broke out a sneak preview this week (via Media Matters) of what can be expected. Talk radio will be under siege like never before as hosts will come under fire and private broadcast ownership will be forced to alter the content of their programming at proverbial gunpoint. The Internet will be the next to go, as both the right-wing and the left-wing blogosphere will become emasculated and then marginalized through congressional legislation. Yes, you heard me right! The left-wing blogosphere also needs to be controlled in a Clinton presidency; there is no way in hell that President Rodham will be held hostage by the demands of a petulant Markos ‘Screw Them’ Moulitsas and his uncivilized minions. This is her party, bought and paid for, and it will hand her the presidency - everyone else be damned, especially a uncontrollable bunch of college kids pounding away on their laptops!
The rebirth of the Politburo is only one year away; we can only hope that the American people abort this plan before it has a chance to be put into action!
EXTRA: Check out Political Vindication’s long list of Democrat corruption!
Cross-Posted at Political Vindication
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically each day to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always have these articles delivered to your email inbox every day. Click here to sign up.
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
Comments
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
The kooks think Che Guevera was a saint - wait until they meet Mother Hillary! She'll regulate the internet pronto - maybe put into place Wesley Clark's idea of a political ratings system in an effort to "civilize" debate. Watch out KOS - Mother Hillary gonna put you in your place!
The liberal blogosphere hates Hillary as much as they hate Giuliani (I'm not one of them). But they don't think Che Guevara was a saint. And I'm sure any other candidate would do the EXACT same thing as she would, except maybe for the nuts like Ron Paul, Kucinich and Gravel.
This is very interesting, but unsurprising at the same time. Probably won't be the last time something like this happens.
i do think there is some love affair with che guevara among liberals, not really sure why.
Simmons,I would agree with you that most liberals do not believe that Che was a Saint. But, I think Evrvignlt%u2019s point is that there is a leftist movement (however small) that does venerate the Communist murder. I witnessed this first hand when I went to college. The question that still baffles me to this day is%u2026 WHY?
Whoa, whoa, whoa now…let's not get all bent out of shape there good Uncle….it would be unfair of us to really know the candidate, especially if she is to stand a chance of being elected.Hillary Clinton should not be held to any realistic standard(s), at least for now as she is still in the process of morphing. We shouldn't hold her responsible for things that went wrong in her husbands administration even when she claims a connection to things she feels went right.
Continuation from above (submission issue "no parameters") It's becoming obvious she doesn't feel anything went wrong and she is more than happy to claim success even when it was forced by the Republican majority. This previous is a decent indication of why Dems have really fought tooth and nail against the present administration; Bush cannot be allowed to appear to be successful in anything. Where this is a sad state of affairs is that this required the Dems to fight against everything Bush, which of course requires the denial of what is actually going on in Iraq and elsewhere and this is all to our detriment. Perhaps it is unfair to expect them to place the citizens of this nations interests above their own; regardless they are definitely NOT doing so. Simmons: "But they don't think Che Guevara was a saint." What's with the t-shirts then, ignorance?
I'm getting ready to read another book on Che Guevara - Humberto Fontovas Useful Idiots biography of the little executioner. Ive gotten in some lights out debates over this guy with liberals (leftists) who scream he is a victim of misrepresentation. Ugh. Any protest you go to you see countless shirts with his mug on them - its sickening. But he is definitely more respected on the left today than he should be.
You had me going there for a minute Blandly - ha! LOL!
Where do you see Republicans trying to ban television movies that reflect poorly on them? Or clamoring for the fairness doctrine - which is a flat out attack on political speech? Wesley Clark wants a ratings system for political speech - what Repub would say anything so asinine? Democrats and their front runner are out of control. Modern Liberalism has nothing to do with freedom.
"http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/04/cbs.reag...
Hey Bland, There is a good track record for Americans to judge Hillary and her husbands administration is fair game. The first Clinton administration was what many commentators refer to as a co-presidency. Not only did Hillary turn a blind eye to Bill%u2019s molestations of women both in Arkansas and Washington, but she went in so far as to defend it. Remember that whole %u2018vast right wing conspiracy%u2019 thing she motioned on national television?She presented a government sponsored health care plan as first lady and she is proposing one as a candidate. The Clinton co-presidency never conducted any press conferences, as Mrs. Rodham still refuses to answer any question today apart from her marketing department. She slandered the lives of countless great American back then, and she has assembled once again that same team. I think we know exactly who Hillary is!
more respected? Most definitely. One of the things that bothers me about those shirts is they are kind of cool looking; if it weren't for who he was I wouldn't mind having one. Perhaps that is part of it, then it becomes a case of learning the faux history that props him up as some kind of a hero rather than what he actually was. I'm probably offline until Tuesday, so everyone have a great weekend! One more thing. With Hillary it's ok if she strong arms, but gee whiz, could you imagine someone on the Right doing this? It probably does, but happily for now we have her as the lone whipping girl….ooohh, sorry, she's a femi-nazi so, whipping woman
Ron Paul is a Digg Fad…
Sqrl - I know where you're going with that broken link - but outrage is different than banning a movie - they won't even release that ABC 9/11 movie on DVD! They're afraid it might hurt Hillary! As for that CBS Reagan movie with James Brolin - outrage came from all quarters: "CBS announced the cancellation Tuesday amid fierce criticism of its portrayal of Reagan and his wife, Nancy. The network insisted, however, its decision had nothing to do with the backlash from Reagan supporters. "This decision is based solely on our reaction to seeing the final film, not the controversy that erupted around a draft of the script," CBS said. The miniseries, originally scheduled to air Nov. 16 and 18, will be shown on CBS' sister pay-cable network Showtime." Nancy Reagan issued a statement last week to the Fox News Channel saying, "The timing of [the miniseries] is absolutely staggering to me. Obviously, it's very hurtful." The 92-year-old former president is suffering from Alzheimer's disease. The Reagans' daughter, Patti Davis, said in a column on Time magazine's website CBS was "doing the right thing" by moving the miniseries to Showtime but charged the story itself still is inaccurate. Producers of the movie, she said, "exhibited astounding carelessness and cruelty in their depiction of my father and my entire family." CBS President and CEO Les Moonves said last week in a CNBC interview the network was adjusting the script to present a more balanced view. Moonves said while he found criticism of a film nobody has seen to be "rather odd," he and his staff were looking at the rough cut and "there are things we think go too far." "So there are some edits being made trying to present a more fair picture of the Reagans," he said. Script excerpts published by the Drudge Report included scenes of Reagan cursing at his staff and his wife slapping her daughter. Other scenes show the former president declaring he is the Anti-Christ and, in response to AIDS, stating, "They that live in sin shall die in sin" – though there is no record of him saying such things." Now, if ABC had a movie saying Hillary was the anti-Christ…!
did you mean…. http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/04/cbs.reag...
did you mean…. http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/04/cbs.reag...
did you mean…. http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/04/cbs.reag...
It is too bad people diss Ron Paul because he does stand for what government should be about. He stood right up to the big guns in the debates as well. It is too bad the power and money in politics will never allow a Ron Paul to sit anywhere but at the kids table at Thanksgiving dinner. Which is a shame because we sorely need better choices then the crap both parties give us every four years. It sucks that there isn't an actual competition among the best in our country to lead us. It's a contest among the wealthy for the priviledge of separating us from our money. Sucks for all of us, but you have to admit the genius behind the system.
Chris, Don%u2019t get me started on Ron Paul! The last we need is someone in office that would give any creditability to the Troffer movement.
Chris C: there is a lot that is a shame in the game of politics, but for me and I would imagine many here Paul goes a bit (I think I may be a bit too generous) over board with many of his theories.
I will agree on some of his ideas but all pols have them. There isn't a lot Paul says though that is really radical or new, they just don't have a snowball's chance in hell of becoming policy. Plus we have already heard ideas like giving every newborn $500 and invading Pakistan. Even not wanting to wear a pin of their national symbol of their country. It might just be that Paul picks the wrong wackjob concepts to promote.