Arizona 9/11 Memorial; One Year Later - the Unmemorial

Cross posted from DeMediacratic Nation:

On September 11, 2006 I visited the Arizona 9/11 Memorial at its opening. Following the fanfare led by Governor Janet Napolitano at its unveiling I visited for a closer inspection to read the panels.

Unfortunately I had no camera in hand; I certainly did not expect to have the reaction that I did; seeing it was a memorial to those lost on that sorrowful day. Suffice it to say, I brought my camera the next day and posted my reaction in my Arizona’s Offensively Politically Correct 9/11 Memorial post.

Yesterday’s Arizona Republic called the memorial “still a lightning rod,” and covered the slow effort to edit this appalling “piece” of Leftist trash that rather than honor those on that day, tries to perform an educational experiment representing various views in negative PC-speak.

A “lightening rod” could have been avoided had the commission responsible for the debacle kept to the day and the sorrow; a memorial as it should be to the victims of Tuesday, September 11, 2001.

Some plates included on the memorial that miss the 9/11 target, but not the Leftist one:

AZ 911 Memorial Plates

“Fear of Foreigners” Balbir Singh Sodhi, A Sike, murdered in Mesa”

“Foreign-Born Americans Afraid”

“Must Bomb Back”

“You don’t win battles of terrorism with more battles”

“1st US soldier killed by enemy fire in Afghanistan”

“Middle East violence motivates attacks in US”

“Erroneous US air strike kills 46 Uruzgan civilians’

“Avtar Singh Cheira, a Sikh, shot in Phoenix”

“Terrorist organization leader addresses American people”

Interestingly, the commission has been revisiting and working on replacement panels, which according to The Republic would:

“Remove two inscriptions, including an inaccurate reference to an “erroneous” U.S. air strike that killed civilians in Afghanistan.

Add two explanatory panels near the front of the memorial that emphasize the historical events of 9/11 and help visitors interpret the memorial.

Etch as many as seven new inscriptions into the memorial, including “Let’s roll” and “God bless America.””

Remove an “inaccurate” panel regarding an “erroneous” U.S. air strike? Inaccuracy misses the point; does anyone recall that “erroneous” U.S. air strike on the 11th of September 2001? Remember the images above?

Adding “Let’s roll” and “God bless America” are certainly more appropriate as they were spoken that day, but they still appear to be missing the point. Sure, you can include the words of those that took the bull by the horns and dealt with a life threatening moment.

According to the paper, this “revision” is a “delicate balance;” because:

“the public remained divided. Supporters rallied to the memorial’s defense at a series of public hearings, saying the memorial reflects the nation’s conflicted psyche in the days surrounding the terrorist attacks.”

May I suggest at this time that we approach this “delicate balance,” with the raising of the “Nation’s Conflicted Psyche 9/11 Memorial,” in Wesley Bolin Park in Phoenix Arizona.

In an era when so much is politicized that we keep the political garbage out of a local tombstone memorializing families’ losses? Memorializing Americans and others that walked into work one morning just like any other day prior, but did now walk out.

A memorial such as this that claims to be a memorial to “the family, friends and fellow citizens we lost on September 11,” because they “should never be forgotten.” One way to avoid forgetting the names of those taken, would be to include their names in a “memorial” to them, rather than a plaque listing the members of the “Governors September 11th Memorial Commission;” especially in a memorial so unmemorable.

A “lightening rod” could have been avoided had the commission responsible for the debacle kept to the day and the sorrow; a memorial as it should be to the victims of Tuesday, September 11, 2001.


Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically each day to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always have these articles delivered to your email inbox every day. Click here to sign up.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

No trackbacks/pingbacks yet.

Comments

Politicization of a memorial day is (perfectly real) immoral. Nonetheless, here is the question: 9/11 has wrongly been blamed on American jingoism and self-imposed naivety. This is like blaming capitalist system for Russian mafias. Islamofascists have an agenda which is not affected whatsoever by anything the U.S. does or will do. Roll, Jordan, roll.

God Bless you X; as usual you have nailed that sum benotch on the head or hit the nail on the head…not sure which

agree both with the article and middleXeast's comments. The only reason why 911 didn't happen sooner is nobody was nuts enough to attack us on our soil. Someone finally answered the sick call to arms. Now it's game on for terrorism in the world. 9/11/01 showed each of us that terrorists hate us as much as the Jews. That didn't get built up because of what we did as a country exclusively.

I agree with you that the names of each and every person should be included in the memorial. And with that an accurate timeline of events on that day. The controversy of this memorial reflects the lingering lack of a sense of resolution to this matter. The alledged perpetrator, Osama bin Laden is still at large, serving as a role model for other would-be terrorists. Something far beyond the efforts of a 911 commission or congressional panel in a thorough, unfettered criminal investigation into this matter is required. If there were others who acted in collusion with the terrorists they should be routed-out and dealt with under the rule of law. The souls of the thousands of Americans who needlessly died on that day cry-out for justice. It behooves us, to make it happen, for their sake and for the sake of future generations of Americans.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)